These articles expand on the frameworks covered in each session. They're written to be read on their own, whether or not you've registered for the workshop series.
Information items, discussion items and decision items each need a different amount of prepared structure. When they're bundled together on one flat list, the meeting tends to run over on whichever item was scheduled last, usually the decision that mattered most.
Open floor discussion tends to favour whoever speaks first or loudest. A structured round, where each person gets a fixed short turn before open discussion begins, changes who gets heard without adding much time to the meeting.
Length is usually the deciding factor. Briefs under one page, with a clear "decisions needed" section at the top, get read before the meeting far more often than longer documents buried in an inbox.
Elaborate decision logs with a dozen columns tend to get abandoned within a month. A log with just the decision, the owner, the deadline and a reference link is more likely to survive because it takes under a minute to complete after each meeting.
A single chaotic week doesn't mean the frameworks failed. Looking at the full thirty days, rather than any single week, gives a more even picture of whether meeting habits are actually shifting.
Breakout rooms remove some of the spontaneity of in-person practice but make it easier to record and replay a facilitation attempt for review, which some participants find more useful than a single live pass.
The series is designed sequentially, with each session referencing templates introduced earlier. Attending in order gets the most out of the structure, though the materials are also usable as standalone references if a session is missed.
The frameworks were developed with both remote and hybrid team structures in mind. The async brief format in session three, for example, tends to be especially relevant for remote teams working across different time zones within Australia.
The material has been applied by leaders managing teams from around five people up to several dozen direct and indirect reports. Larger teams may need to adapt the decision log slightly to track more parallel workstreams.
It's included as part of the series and most participants find it useful for seeing whether habits have shifted, but it's a self-directed exercise you complete on your own schedule after the sessions end.
Send us a message and we'll get back to you with a direct answer.
Ask a question